Now hear this: it’s personal. And, to the degree that it’s personal, it’s not subject to scrutiny or substantiation by anyone else. “The truth” has given way to “My truth.” Facts that are universally and objectively certain are no longer the basis for thinking and believing. The traditional oath administered to a witness in a courtroom is no longer meaningful: “Do you swear that the testimony you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?” How can a person with “my truth” commit to the truth?
Even more challenging than a modern courtroom is the difficulty of nailing down new-gen young adults regarding their positions concerning God. Are you tracking with the contemporary faith neighborhood?
A new study by the Pew Research Center reveals that many religiously unaffiliated adults — often referred to as “nones” — still hold beliefs commonly associated with religion, such as belief in life after death, a spiritual realm, or even God. Does that mean that they’ve bought into The Truth?
Ryan Burge – a political scientist and Baptist pastor – has been studying the “nones” and their expansion.
“We have come to believe that lots of people are engaging in what we would describe as ‘aspirational spirituality.’ Put simply, folks want to be perceived as having a deep well of spirituality inside them. They do not want to be perceived as vapid and superficial. So they will say that they are deeply spiritual, but then do nothing to express that feeling. In our minds, it’s a similar phenomenon to the significant number of people who say that they are evangelical but don’t go to church.”
Pew’s data shed light on the reasons why people become religiously unaffiliated.
“In a 2023 U.S. survey, only about a third of “nones” cited a lack of belief in God or a higher power as a very important reason for their disaffiliation. Nearly the same proportion (30%) pointed to negative experiences with religious people. Even more (47%) said they are nonreligious because they don’t like religious organizations.”
Whatever their reasons and ruminations, the framework for “their truth” is a radical departure from the embrace of orthodoxy based on divine revelation.
So… who gets to write the sequel to God’s Truth, presuming that their updated version of what’s-what will hold up in the end-of-life courtroom over which the King of Kings will preside?
Paul delivered his warning about our era in his letter to his spiritual son, Timothy:
“But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God – having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people. They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth” (2 Timothy 3).
Does it sound like he’s referencing our world, circa 2025?
Jude – likely a half-brother of Jesus and one of the early church fathers – wrote this caution:
“Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt compelled to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to God’s holy people. For certain individuals whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord” (Jude 3).
Here’s the crucial qualifier: “your truth” fades into irrelevance when positioned alongside “the truth” that is God’s eternal declaration. I’m only safe when I conclude – by willful determination – that His truth is my truth, now and forever, amen.
If asked by a friend, over coffee: “What is your truth?” How would you respond?
Bob Shank
___
Discover the locations of our new cohort launches! CLICK HERE
A respected self-proclaimed atheist friend of mine challenged me with this question, “If your discovered Truth is Jesus Christ does it not follow that makes all other religions and beliefs false? Isn’t that rather exclusive, arrogant and intolerant?” I responded that truth by its very nature and definition is exclusive. It does not, therefore, in its absoluteness meet the contemporary politically correct test because Truth is exclusive.
The law of non-contradiction in logic is that two opposing claims cannot both be true. Truth stands alone as an absolute and does contradict other beliefs leaving no option except the choice to believe or not to believe. Jesus the Christ claimed not to be a way, but to be the Way, the Truth and the Life. He even went further in his claim to be God. This exclusive claim to be the Truth presents a problem to those who say there is no truth or that there is truth in all religions. “Your Truth vs THE TRUTH provides a convenient way to rationalize whatever behavior or lifestyle you choose. It is called moral relativism. It leaves a void and bitter “taste” with consequences you cannot choose.
Great addition to my morning missive, Bud! Thanks for posting…
Bob Perry Writes: There are two kinds of truth. One depends on our opinion of things. This is called subjective truth. The other depends on the way the world actually is. This is called objective truth. Most people never think about the difference between the two. And that makes any discussion of the concept of truth a difficult one to tackle. But we must tackle it. The way we understand truth impacts every aspect of our lives. And the way we answer life’s biggest questions depends on it implicitly. Truth is an objective feature of the world we live in. It’s foundational to reality itself. Check out the full writing. https://crossexamined.org/how-do-we-know-the-truth-is-out-there/#:~:text=By%20Bob%20Perry&text=One%20depends%20on%20our%20opinion,This%20is%20called%20objective%20truth.
I like Francis Schaefer’s illustration of these two truths. Like a two story house, the 1st floor is where absolute and objective truth resides i.e. 2+2=4; or God exists. These are provable and applicable to everyone (whether they accept it or not). The 2nd story is private or subjective truth based on personal tastes, opinions, desires etc. You like ice cream but I like cake. Both are “”true” to the person but not universal.
The problem is when persons want to move private truth from the 2nd floor to the 1st floor and want (or demand) others to accept it as absolute!